Search results

  1. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    I thank you for your attention and indeed the "spirit" that has always inspired me (perhaps sometimes in an apparently uncooperative form due to my very poor knowledge of the English language - I am quite old, recently retired but still, I hope sufficiently alert: this attitude, and I say this...
  2. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    I fully agree... so it is perfectly useless for those "modifications" to be modifiable since, even without a network, even without carrying out an Upgrade, they will still be reset.
  3. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    That I didn't understand... that's for sure! But could you explain to me why, immediately after installing the ISO obtained from NTLite - in which I deleted those scheduled tasks - with the network disconnected and without having done any Windows update, those scheduled tasks are still active...
  4. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    I can't control whether they are in the ISO but I can tell you that by installing the ISO (post NTLite including those deletions) without carrying out any Windows update, those tasks - in scheduled Windows tasks - are there and are active! Then stopping and deleting those activities is not a...
  5. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    I apologize but I absolutely didn't remember that I had already asked the same question (you know, the years pass and I become more and more...) but the fact is that - I seem to have understood - that NTLite does its dirty work while CU restores what has been removed. And in this sense I was...
  6. C

    Scheduled Tasks - InstallService / ScanForUpdates...

    Per Nuhi and Garlin I wanted to point out that although I have removed these "Scheduled Tasks", they are regularly active after installing the OS.I was wondering: 1) Am I wrong about something? 2) Maybe NTLite doesn't perform these operations "completely"? 3) Isn't it possible to eliminate...
  7. C

    Disable Microsoft Edge

    Garlin, that's why I wrote "2 months" (I already tested the 3371)
  8. C

    Disable Microsoft Edge

    If you remember, once with the command from PowerShell "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\Edge\Application\<num_vers>\Installer\setup.exe" --uninstall --system-level --verbose-logging --force-uninstall MS Edge was not completely uninstalled; today, yes! This is why, for the avoidance of doubt...
  9. C

    Disable Microsoft Edge

    ... should not. But to avoid any misunderstanding, at the moment I continue to insert the .reg file Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\EdgeUpdate] "DoNotUpdateToEdgeWithChromium"=dword:00000001
  10. C

    Processing not carried out (NTLite v2024.3.9819)

    For Nuhi NTLite v2024.3.9819 Win 11 3371 (UUPDump) Looking more carefully at the detailed processing of NTLite, I realized that these settings (deflag) relating to Internet Explorer 32bit and WMIC have apparently not been processed (they are "grey") despite appearing in the preset...
  11. C

    NTLite 9783 Windows could not complete the installation after adding a Package

    I keep repeating myself and I'm sorry... - "Isolated" image - Added Defender and MSIX/APPX updates as per screen -Apply = processing I receive an error warning attached and it does NOT integrate the 3 MSIX/APPX files as attached. Surely I'm the one who makes mistakes but... I'm curious...
  12. C

    NTLite 9783 Windows could not complete the installation after adding a Package

    Could it be that the problem comes from Load --> Add of a preset obtained with a version of NTLite 9780 - in which there is no certain information?
  13. C

    Tasks (UScheduler) duplicated

    For Nuhi I don't know if deliberately... but the voice: Settings/Tasks (UScheduler) it is also repeated in: Settings/Windows Update/Task (UScheduler)
  14. C

    Problem with "isolated" versions (NTLite v2024.3.9780)

    Small note (probably old thing but which I only noticed now that I was studying NTLite more carefully after 2 sudden crashes without completing the processing and without any log) In the features, despite having disabled both OpenSSH and Work Folder Client, in the final processing, there is no...
  15. C

    Problem with "isolated" versions (NTLite v2024.3.9780)

    I was thinking that perhaps I had processed that install.wim (isolated) with the 9780 (although I inserted image as the status and I thought it was enough). I'll rework from scratch with 9782 and if anything I'll let you know. Thanks anyway EDIT: You are right. I had processed the install.wim...
  16. C

    Problem with "isolated" versions (NTLite v2024.3.9780)

    I'm sorry to report another problem with version 9782 as well. Still relating to "isolated" versions, having solved the "status" problem, I found that the 9782 does not copy (completely missing) the setupcomplete.cmd file in the ..\Windows\Setup\Scripts\ folder so by installing the version all...
  17. C

    Problem with "isolated" versions (NTLite v2024.3.9780)

    I wanted to point out that when operating with "isolated" versions, the option presented by default for post-setup [ISO] causes NTLite to crash (with isolated versions the $OEM$ folder does not exist but NTLite writes to .\Windows\setup) In my opinion, this situation should still be reported...
  18. C

    Italian language translation thread (Upg 2026.05.11090

    Version 2023.12.9552 --> 2024.3.9796 (Final) - template.xml file. Add string (new): Post <S3237> <S3288>Application Targeted Feature Database</S3288> <S3290>Input View Experience</S3290> Post <S3262> <S3271>Choose a fit for your desktop image</S3271> <S3285>Select which automatic installs to...
  19. C

    Do you use NTLite beta's?

    I carry out tests with it (portable version which however does not remain updated) above all to "understand" what to expect from the new version
Back
Top