Please allow the filtering of Checked/Unchecked Components

M

Mortadello

New Member
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hey all,

I really really would love to see a feature in which you would be able to **visually** distinguish what settings/components I chose, because when I debloat and lets say 2/3 of components are removed, due to my eyes being abit slow and tiresome sometimes, it would help tremendously to be able to see at a first glance what I checked and also what I unchecked, so do please consider adding a filter so you can see both sides, so far removed and what will remain on the system.

have a good day!
 
Hi,
already got this suggestion multiple times before, so it's time to do it, thank you for your feedback.

So am I correct in assuming you would like a filter show only checked/unchecked?
Last time I also asked this, in the event that an uncheckecd component is under a semi-checked one (will be kept), does the filter show only unchecked shows that subcomponent?

For example:
Component A (checked)
- Component B (unchecked)

Show only unchecked flattened, or do you want to see that Component B is under Component A for context?
 
nuhi said:
Hi,
already got this suggestion multiple times before, so it's time to do it, thank you for your feedback.

So am I correct in assuming you would like a filter show only checked/unchecked?
Last time I also asked this, in the event that an uncheckecd component is under a semi-checked one (will be kept), does the filter show only unchecked shows that subcomponent?

For example:
Component A (checked)
- Component B (unchecked)

Show only unchecked flattened, or do you want to see that Component B is under Component A for context?
Click to expand...
hey man, thx for the response.

nuhi said:
Show only unchecked flattened, or do you want to see that Component B is under Component A for context?
Click to expand...
Just show it flattened, like even if (Checked)ComponentA -> (Unchecked)SubComponent, still show ComponentA when filter "Show Checked" is on, ofcourse, and vice versa if filter is set to "Show Unchecked".
 
nuhi said:
Show only unchecked flattened, or do you want to see that Component B is under Component A for context?
Click to expand...
Actually, would it be be alot of work to do both, as I type I really see value for both views, for some the major context is enough, others could value to litterally see ONLY checked ones from ALL components gathered. What is your thought?
 
Currently I'm in the absorbing mode, so let's go nuts and see where it leads us.
So would one-level be enough, or you want down to the root?
meaning:
Component A (semi-checked)
- Component B (semi-checked)
- Component C (unchecked)

Show both A and B, or just B, in that special context mode?
 
We could name the third mode Hide - Checked, or Hide - Unchecked, so it keeps all the hierarchies, just trims the leaves for better readability without losing overview.
 
Since I needed to release some important fixes, here it is in the public version, let me know how you like it.
It would be a bit more logical to name "Show only", but it would be too wide of a name.
 
nuhi said:
Currently I'm in the absorbing mode, so let's go nuts and see where it leads us.
So would one-level be enough, or you want down to the root?
meaning:
Component A (semi-checked)
- Component B (semi-checked)
- Component C (unchecked)

Show both A and B, or just B, in that special context mode?
Click to expand...

You mean like in the image right? If so, as I see it, there should then be options to **only show the directly-unchecked** OR if you desire to see the complete context, to see what you already see in the image.
with complete context I mean like:
Main-Node-Component
-> Sub-Node-Component
-> ActualThingToUncheck

Now, the filter can show 3 things:
1. Show Only removed (No Context)
= Will Show "Erweiterter Video-Renderer (EVR) -> "Media Foundation" -> "Komponentenpaket-Unterstützung"
2. Show Only removed (with Context)
= "Komponentenpaket-Unterstützung"
3. Show only remaining
= Will just show simply all checked ones, their context remains anyway so there is only this option for the remain-part.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

I do not see the image, but anyway, can you please try the new version if you haven't.
It's in the toolbar - see if the functionality covers all needed, then we can talk if naming is confusing.
 
nuhi said:
Hi,

I do not see the image, but anyway, can you please try the new version if you haven't.
It's in the toolbar - see if the functionality covers all needed, then we can talk if naming is confusing.
Click to expand...
Its fantastic, it covers all options perfectly settable via a listbox, well done Sir and much thanks!

It really simplifies the debloat process in another way because one can, when you have to read such tiny rows with alot of important details in order to remove carefully, be easily get tired eyes and remove smth which breaks stuff and this really helps to keep the view clean and prevents bad accidents, Gj!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top