Kasual
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,508
- Reaction score
- 514
One was for Journal stuff, even tho Microsoft removed Journal stuff in a later KB.
Interestingly, Update also offered me a cummulative update for IE11, even tho I removed IE11 using Windows' Features.
I didn't accept it, but am not sure if I shouldn't. I know from the old days of WinNT and XP, that IE was tightly integrated into the OS, and updating IE6 would often bring subtle improvements to the Desktop UI. So even though one might have "removed" IE, roots of it are still in the OS.
For now, unless someone gives me a good reason to do it, I'm not going to accept that cumulative update.
P.S. The KB for IE11 (KB4483187) says that it fixes a java script error to prevent remote code execution.
Again, since I have "removed" IE11, it's hard to see how I could be affected by a malformed java script.
(It's my understanding that java script is run in the browser. Not in the OS.)
Skip the Journal removal update, is not a real (let's say big) risk as IE.
You didn't removed IE, you have removed access to IE, try typing an address in Windows Explorer, if it loads the webpage, it is active but not accessible/associated to open url/links (if you have optional features/windows update compatibility enabled, you can enable IE without having access to the internet).
This IE has no real integration changes as IE6, i think there are Windows 3.1 (dll's) roots in Windows 10.
I wouldn't install any IE Update if i don't expect to be a malware target.
P.S. Javascript is run/needed/called by many programs/browsers (check compatibility protections).